www.setexasrecord.com
Jul. 5, 2008 | S.E. Texas' Legal Journal
 
ARGUMENTS

Haunting Jerry Little

3/22/2008 8:50 AM

Port Neches newspaper trasher Jerry Little is afraid.

Not of the law but of a free press.

Little made that clear to our editor, Marilyn Tennissen, when she watched him last Monday as he cleared out a Record newspaper rack in front of the Jefferson County Courthouse. She confronted Little after observing him take a large number of copies into the men's bathroom where the newspapers were later found in a trash container.

"If I've committed a crime, then charge me," Little challenged Tennissen.

We don't carry badges at The Record, nor are we authorized to execute the laws of Texas. So Tennissen couldn't oblige.

But somebody else might. A number of free newspaper-takers in this and other states have been charged and punished for their actions, usually inspired by the same fear driving Little.

There was the Austin man who trashed 5,800 copies of the Daily Texan because he didn't like a story it published about him. Or the Florida homecoming queen who asked friends to trash copies of a newspaper carrying an article revealing her criminal record. And the Berkeley, Calif., mayor who disposed of hundreds of copies of a newspaper because it carried an endorsement of his opponent.

All were scared, less of being arrested than for being openly challenged by a free and independent press, the public's watchdog.

Like Little, these opponents of free speech were worried that their views weren't strong enough to survive the challenge of an opposing view. They wanted to silence any discussion that might be more convincing than theirs.

It's a plausible explanation for Little's one-man crusade against the First Amendment. Since mid-February courthouse readers have been complaining that our newspaper racks often become empty minutes after being filled.

Little has been a regular observer at a trial we've been following closely. That is the trial in which multi-millionaire lawyer Glen Morgan is seeking an epic settlement out of chemical-maker DuPont.

We know Morgan doesn't agree with our editorial page position on the case. We can't imagine he would want others to have the benefit of our views.

But that doesn't explain Little, who isn't saying why he did what he did at our newsrack.

Rather than an explanation, we have a better idea. Write for us, Mr. Little, and we're glad to let bygones be bygones.

Lay it all out. Tell everyone how wrong we are. We'll feature it prominently on the same pages you seem to loathe. And if you think it's helpful, tell us if you represent anyone other than yourself.

Here's hoping you take the invitation.



EMAIL A FRIEND | PRINT | DIGG THIS | POST TO DEL.ICIO.US




COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE

No comments have been posted in the last 15 days!


SEND US YOUR COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE



* - Required fields

Subject: *
Message: *
Contact Name: *
Contact URL:
Contact Email: *
Write the text from image below to this textbox


Human image test


SUBSCRIBE To get our free email newsletter and make changes to your subscription:
 
 Subscribe to Print Edition
 Renew Print Edition Subscription
Legally Speaking: The Justies – Part II - 7/1/2008
Legally Speaking: The Justies – Part I - 6/25/2008

ARGUMENTS Archive

Who is negligent when a drunk driver dies in a head on?
The bar
 
 
(8.16%)
The other driver
 
 
(3.06%)
The drunk
 
 
(84.69%)
All of the above
 
 
(4.08%)
 
This poll is closed.

Total Votes: 98

View Results
Need to know more about us or have questions? Try the links below:
By way of introduction
About Us
Contact The Record



Chicago Steaks

Happiness Spreads