www.setexasrecord.com
Jul. 3, 2009 | S.E. Texas' Legal Journal
 
NEWS

Smoker dies from lung cancer, family sues for asbestos exposure

8/8/2007 3:22 PM
By David Yates

Bryan Blevins
Provost Umphrey attorney Bryan Blevins, who on a monthly average files half-a-dozen asbestos lawsuits in Jefferson County, will from time to time branch out.

Representing the wife and daughter of Elbert Traver, Blevins filed an asbestos lawsuit against the A.O. Smith Corp., along with 45 other major companies, with the Orange County District Court on Aug. 2.

Blevins and his clients claim the companies conspired to manufacture and distribute asbestos-containing products, maliciously and purposely inflicting Traver with lung cancer.

Traver had already sued and received a claim for his "non-malignant asbestos-related disease with one or more of the defendants," the suit said. But now his family is seeking compensation for a "different malignant asbestos-related disease."

Medical documents attached to the suit say Traver, a former smoker, was first exposed to asbestos in 1942. He was an industrial carpenter, welder and laborer for various refineries and plants.

Tarver was born in 1932 and passed away on Aug. 10, 2005. A copy of his death certificate was attached to the suit.

The suit names corporations from aerospace giant Lockheed Martin to iron supplier Zurn Industries for manufacturing and distributing asbestos laced products.

The petition says the defendants entangled in his lawsuit were negligent, failing to adequately test their asbestos-laced products before flooding the market with dangerous goods.

In addition, the petition faults Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Corp. (3M Corporation) and American Optical Corp. for producing defective masks that failed to "provide respiratory protection."

Heirs of his estate, Carol Traver and Jackie Spears, will sue for Traver's alleged wrongful death and his for physical pain and suffering in the past and future, mental anguish in the past and future, lost wages, loss of earning capacity, disfigurement in the past and future, physical impairment in the past and future, and past and future medical expenses.

The case has been assigned to the 260th Judicial District.

Case No. D070-375.c




EMAIL A FRIEND | PRINT | DIGG THIS | POST TO DEL.ICIO.US




COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE

blog comments powered by Disqus
SUBSCRIBE To get our free email newsletter and make changes to your subscription:
 
 Subscribe to Print Edition
 Renew Print Edition Subscription
Shopping for success - 6/27/2009
Legally Speaking: A Poor Excuse for a Column - 6/24/2009

ARGUMENTS Archive

Should Huntsman have settled or continued the trial against the bankers that backed out of the Hexion deal?
Settlement was right
 
(52%)
Continued trial
 
(48%)
Total Votes:21

Thank you for voting in this poll.

This poll is closed.

View Results
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
Need to know more about us or have questions? Try the links below:
By way of introduction
About Us
Contact The Record