www.setexasrecord.com
Jul. 5, 2008 | S.E. Texas' Legal Journal
 
NEWS

Federal court upholds ' One State Under God ' in Texas Pledge of Allegiance

8/28/2007 10:28 PM

DALLAS - Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott prevailed in federal court Tuesday, Aug. 28, where a North Texas couple tried to prevent schoolchildren from reciting the Texas Pledge of Allegiance.

A federal district judge ruled against David Wallace Croft and his wife, Shannon, who sought a preliminary injunction because the Texas Legislature recently added the words "one state under God" to the state Pledge. Solicitor General Ted Cruz argued on the state's behalf.

"With today's ruling, a federal judge denied the plaintiffs' attempt to prevent Texas schoolchildren from pledging their allegiance to 'one state under God' - just as they pledge to 'one nation under God,'" Attorney General Abbott said. "The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly held patriotic acknowledgments of the Almighty such as these are completely consistent with the U.S. Constitution. Texans can rest assured that we will continue vigorously defending their children's ability to recite the state Pledge of Allegiance each morning."

The plaintiffs, both professed atheists, filed the lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Their children are students in the Carrollton-Farmers Branch Independent School District.

The voluntary, teacher-led recitation of the Texas Pledge typically follows the U.S. Pledge of Allegiance in classrooms across the state. According to the state's brief, the Legislature added the words "one state under God" to acknowledge the tradition and religious heritage inherent in America's founding.

The state contends the Texas Pledge is an acknowledgment of patriotism and citizenship. It is a practice that mirrors the Declaration of Independence's self-evident truths that citizens are "endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness."

The Attorney General's brief argues that, instead of conflicting with the First Amendment, the Pledge reflects the constitutionally protected freedom of religion.



EMAIL A FRIEND | PRINT | DIGG THIS | POST TO DEL.ICIO.US




COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE

No comments have been posted in the last 15 days!


SEND US YOUR COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE



* - Required fields

Subject: *
Message: *
Contact Name: *
Contact URL:
Contact Email: *
Write the text from image below to this textbox


Human image test


SUBSCRIBE To get our free email newsletter and make changes to your subscription:
 
 Subscribe to Print Edition
 Renew Print Edition Subscription
Legally Speaking: The Justies – Part II - 7/1/2008
Legally Speaking: The Justies – Part I - 6/25/2008

ARGUMENTS Archive

Who is negligent when a drunk driver dies in a head on?
The bar
 
 
(8.16%)
The other driver
 
 
(3.06%)
The drunk
 
 
(84.69%)
All of the above
 
 
(4.08%)
 
This poll is closed.

Total Votes: 98

View Results
Need to know more about us or have questions? Try the links below:
By way of introduction
About Us
Contact The Record



Chicago Steaks

Happiness Spreads