www.setexasrecord.com
May. 22, 2008 | S.E. Texas' Legal Journal
 
NEWS

Soapy mess leads Beaumont couple to sue Whirlpool

9/18/2007 10:16 AM
By David Yates

It may sound like a scene from an "I Love Lucy" episode, but "too much soap" in an overflowing dishwasher was no laughing matter for a Beaumont couple.

Sam and Melanie Bevilacqua claim their brand new Whirlpool dishwasher began malfunctioning after six months of use. When the couple complained, Whirlpool sent a contractor to inspect the dishwasher, who, in turn, told the Bevilacquas they had been using "too much soap."

Not too long after the inspection, the dishwasher broke down and partially flooded the couples' home, which caused "substantial water damage."

The couple filed their breach of contract lawsuit against Whirlpool and Evans Refrigeration and Appliance Services with the Jefferson County District Court on Sept, 12.

"Plaintiffs purchased a new dishwasher from Whirlpool," the suit said. "Just six months after installation, plaintiffs began having problems with the dishwasher. Upon experiencing these problems with their new dishwasher, Plaintiffs sought to have it inspected/serviced. Thereafter, Defendant Evans, by and through Royce P. Evans (an independent contractor selected by Defendant Whirlpool), inspected the dishwasher at which time he falsely advised Plaintiffs that the product was malfunctioning as a result of "too much soap."

"Yet, as it turns out, the dishwasher was defective," the suit said. "Consequently, after Evans' faulty inspection/servicing of the product, plaintiffs sustained substantial water damage throughout their home. As a direct result of Defendants' misrepresentations, negligence, fraud and/or breaches of warranties, Plaintiffs have incurred damages, as set forth below, in a sum within the jurisdictional limits of this court."

The plaintiffs are suing for general damages, valuation damages, cost of repair, loss of use, mental anguish, exemplary damages and all court costs.

They are demanding a trial by jury and are represented by attorney Brian Mazzola of the Law Office of David C. Bernsen.

Judge Donald Floyd, 172nd Judicial District, will preside over the case.

Case No. E180-012



EMAIL A FRIEND | PRINT | DIGG THIS | POST TO DEL.ICIO.US




COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE

No comments have been posted in the last 15 days!


SEND US YOUR COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE



* - Required fields

Subject: *
Message: *
Contact Name: *
Contact URL:
Contact Email: *
Write the text from image below to this textbox


Human image test


SUBSCRIBE To get our free email newsletter and make changes to your subscription:
 
 Subscribe to Print Edition
 Renew Print Edition Subscription
Legally Speaking: Through a Lens, Darkly - 5/21/2008
Conspiracy theory - 5/16/2008

ARGUMENTS Archive

Should courts halt proceedings for mandamus review?
Yes
 
 
(50.00%)
No
 
 
(50.00%)
 

Total Votes: 2

View Results
Need to know more about us or have questions? Try the links below:
By way of introduction
About Us
Contact The Record



COOL RECORD PRODUCTS

Chicago Steaks

Happiness Spreads