www.setexasrecord.com
Jul. 3, 2009 | S.E. Texas' Legal Journal
 
NEWS

Woman who slips in vomit sues Wal-Mart

9/27/2007 1:47 PM
By David Yates

With the high volume of consumer traffic pouring through Wal-Mart stores everyday, accidental slip hazards are bound to happen. However, Kissa Madkins claims employees at a Nacogdoches Wal-Mart "intentionally" allowed the puddle of vomit she slipped in to linger.

Madkins filed her personal injury lawsuit on Sept. 24 in the U.S. District Court Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division.

According to the plaintiff's original petition, on Oct. 22, 2005, Madkins paid a visit to the Nacogdoches Wall-Mart. While she was shopping, Madkins "slipped in a puddle of vomit which had been intentionally left unattended by Defendant."

"Defendant's conduct and that of its…employees…constituted a breach of the duty of ordinary care owed by Defendant to Plaintiff," the suit said. "Defendant knew or should have known that the condition on its premises created an unreasonable risk of harm to invitees like Plaintiff."

As a result of Wal-Mart's alleged negligence, Madkins claims she suffered "severe personal injuries," the suit said. However, the suit does not say what parts of her body she injured.

"Plaintiff has incurred medical expenses in connection with necessary medical treatment for injuries arising out of the incident and, in all probability, will incur medical expenses in the future for the care and treatment of her injuries," the suit said.

Madkins is suing for past and future medical expenses, physical impairment, loss of earning capacity, pain and mental anguish.

"Plaintiff's damage exceeds $75,000, exclusive of interests and costs (and) demands a trial by jury on all issues of fact," the suit said.

Madkins is represented by Charles Dendy, Attorney at Law.

U.S. District Judge Ron Clark has been assigned to the case.

Case No. 9:07CV227




EMAIL A FRIEND | PRINT | DIGG THIS | POST TO DEL.ICIO.US




COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE

blog comments powered by Disqus
SUBSCRIBE To get our free email newsletter and make changes to your subscription:
 
 Subscribe to Print Edition
 Renew Print Edition Subscription
Shopping for success - 6/27/2009
Legally Speaking: A Poor Excuse for a Column - 6/24/2009

ARGUMENTS Archive

Should Huntsman have settled or continued the trial against the bankers that backed out of the Hexion deal?
Settlement was right
 
(52%)
Continued trial
 
(48%)
Total Votes:21

Thank you for voting in this poll.

This poll is closed.

View Results
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
Need to know more about us or have questions? Try the links below:
By way of introduction
About Us
Contact The Record