www.setexasrecord.com
Jul. 4, 2009 | S.E. Texas' Legal Journal
 
NEWS

Paraplegic sues Toyota for defective restraints

10/11/2007 9:40 AM
By Michelle Massey, Texarkana Bureau

1998 Toyota 4-Runner
MARSHALL - Failing to stop at an intersection in Lewisville, an empty gravel-hauler truck slammed into David Williams' 1998 Toyota 4 Runner, rendering him a permanent paraplegic.

Williams believes his significant injuries are due to a defective occupant restraint system, specifically the back and head restraints, which made his vehicle "unreasonably dangerous."

Williams and his wife filed the motor vehicle product liability suit against Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Technical Center and Toyota Motor Sales on Oct. 3 in the Marshall Division of the Eastern District of Texas.

According to the plaintiffs' original complaint, Carlos Alberto Castro, an employee of Rivera Trucking, failed to stop the gravel hauler at an intersection and collided into Williams' stopped Toyota 4-Runner.

The lawsuit asserts that Toyota is responsible for Williams' damages due to negligence and strict liability for defective design, manufacture and marketing of the 1998 Toyota 4-Runner. The complaint states that safer alternative designs for the occupant restraint system could have prevented the rearward seat failure.

Williams maintains Toyota failed to warn its customers of the "unsafe design characteristics" and that the occupant restraint system "might not adequately restrain in a rear impact." Williams also claims that the mandatory federal standards for the seats and occupant restrain systems were inadequate for public protection.

The plaintiffs are seeking damages for medical expenses, physical pain, mental anguish, pecuniary expenses, economic losses, permanent disfigurement and disability. Williams' wife is seeking damages for the loss of her husband's "care, maintenance, support, advice, services, counsel, comfort, contributions of pecuniary value and household services."

In addition, the lawsuit seeks exemplary damages "from defendants' fraud, malice, willful acts, omissions, or gross neglect" due to Toyota's conscious indifference to the welfare and safety of its consumers

Representing the plaintiffs are Marshall attorneys Carl R. Roth and Michael C. Smith of the Roth Law Firm and Dallas attorney Leon R. Russell.

Currently, defendants have not responded to the lawsuit.

U.S. District Judge T. John Ward has been assigned to the case.

Case No.: 2:07cv00442



EMAIL A FRIEND | PRINT | DIGG THIS | POST TO DEL.ICIO.US




COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE

blog comments powered by Disqus
SUBSCRIBE To get our free email newsletter and make changes to your subscription:
 
 Subscribe to Print Edition
 Renew Print Edition Subscription
Shopping for success - 6/27/2009
Legally Speaking: A Poor Excuse for a Column - 6/24/2009

ARGUMENTS Archive

Should Huntsman have settled or continued the trial against the bankers that backed out of the Hexion deal?
Settlement was right
 
(52%)
Continued trial
 
(48%)
Total Votes:21

Thank you for voting in this poll.

This poll is closed.

View Results
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
Need to know more about us or have questions? Try the links below:
By way of introduction
About Us
Contact The Record