www.setexasrecord.com
Jul. 3, 2009 | S.E. Texas' Legal Journal
 
NEWS

Woman sues for trip over hat rack

1/31/2008 1:00 PM
By David Yates

Dan Street
Failing to pay attention to her surroundings, Barbara Vice-Staples tripped over a wooden rack at a service station, which she claims was "projecting out into her path."

Vice-Staples has filed suit against Vishal K. Enterprise, L.P., alleging that the store "negligently allowed a wooden rack to be placed in the path of customers."

Her suit was filed in the Jefferson County District Court on Jan. 30.

According to the plaintiff's petition, Vishal K. Enterprise owns and operates a service station in Dallas County, Texas. On June 13, 2006, Vice-Staples was a visiting the station and "as she turned to walk away from the register area she tripped and fell over the leg of a wooden cap rack that was projecting out into her path."

The suit alleges Vishal K. Enterprise committed the following acts of negligence:

  • Allowing the wooden rack to be placed in the path of customers;
  • Allowing the leg of the rack to project out into the customer traffic area;
  • Failing to remove the rack once it knew or should have known of its presence;
    Failing to have barricades, signs, or other warnings properly placed around the area;
  • Failing to warn Plaintiff of the rack;
  • Failing to properly inspect the premises for dangerous conditions;
  • And failing to remedy the dangerous condition once it knew or should have known of said condition.

    "As a proximate result of Defendant's negligence, Plaintiff has incurred physician's, hospital, dental and pharmacy bills and has suffered physical pain and mental anguish as a result of her injuries, and same will continue a long time into the future, if not permanently, all in an amount in excess of the minimum jurisdictional level of this Court," the suit said.

    Vice-Staples is represented by Dallas attorney Dan Street of the Street & Ragsdale law firm.

    Judge Gary Sanderson, 60th Judicial District, has been assigned to the case.

    Case No. B181-140




  • EMAIL A FRIEND | PRINT | DIGG THIS | POST TO DEL.ICIO.US




    COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE

    blog comments powered by Disqus
    SUBSCRIBE To get our free email newsletter and make changes to your subscription:
     
     Subscribe to Print Edition
     Renew Print Edition Subscription
    Shopping for success - 6/27/2009
    Legally Speaking: A Poor Excuse for a Column - 6/24/2009

    ARGUMENTS Archive

    Should Huntsman have settled or continued the trial against the bankers that backed out of the Hexion deal?
    Settlement was right
     
    (52%)
    Continued trial
     
    (48%)
    Total Votes:21

    Thank you for voting in this poll.

    This poll is closed.

    View Results
    Attention bloggers:
    Add Record Headlines to your site!


    fast + free- click here
    Need to know more about us or have questions? Try the links below:
    By way of introduction
    About Us
    Contact The Record