www.setexasrecord.com
Jul. 3, 2009 | S.E. Texas' Legal Journal
 
NEWS

Legal watchdog urges voters: Know your judicial candidates

3/5/2008 11:26 AM

Press release from Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse

AUSTIN - With the primary elections over, Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse (CALA) groups are urging voters to spend the coming months learning about all judicial candidates' backgrounds and qualifications before heading to the polls for the general election in November.

"Too often, many of us don't spend as much time researching judicial candidates as thoroughly as we research candidates for other offices," said Bill Summers, president of the Rio Grande Valley CALA. "Supreme Court justices and judges at the appellate and local level carry a significant responsibility, and it's our job as voters to know if judicial candidates are qualified and will uphold the proper role of the court."

CALA encourages voters to observe which justices consistently apply the law on a case-by-case basis.

"Following the rule of law and applying the law properly - not meeting some arbitrary percentage of finding for the plaintiffs or defendants - is what makes our courts fair and balanced for all parties," said Chip Hough, chairman of Bay Area CALA in Corpus Christi.

"We urge all Texas voters to be diligent in their research of judicial candidates," added Kirsten Voinis, executive director of CALA of Central Texas. "Take the time to learn about their backgrounds and qualifications for the job."

Diane Davis, executive director of East Texans Against Lawsuit Abuse, added that decisions made by judges have a tremendous impact on our daily lives.

"Voters need to elect judges that will ensure the rights of all parties are protected," Davis said.

Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse is a nonprofit, grassroots coalition dedicated to making the public better aware of the cost and consequences of lawsuit abuse. With five chapters across the state, CALA counts count more than 25,000 supporters among its ranks. For more information, please visit www.tala.com.




EMAIL A FRIEND | PRINT | DIGG THIS | POST TO DEL.ICIO.US




COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE

blog comments powered by Disqus
SUBSCRIBE To get our free email newsletter and make changes to your subscription:
 
 Subscribe to Print Edition
 Renew Print Edition Subscription
Shopping for success - 6/27/2009
Legally Speaking: A Poor Excuse for a Column - 6/24/2009

ARGUMENTS Archive

Should Huntsman have settled or continued the trial against the bankers that backed out of the Hexion deal?
Settlement was right
 
(52%)
Continued trial
 
(48%)
Total Votes:21

Thank you for voting in this poll.

This poll is closed.

View Results
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
Need to know more about us or have questions? Try the links below:
By way of introduction
About Us
Contact The Record