www.setexasrecord.com
Jul. 5, 2008 | S.E. Texas' Legal Journal
 
NEWS

Vidor couple claims previous fire not disclosed before home purchase

5/13/2008 2:58 PM
By David Yates

A Vidor couple is suing a real estate company and its agents after discovering what they claim is evidence their new house had been damaged by a previous fire, a fact the couple says was not disclosed to them before the purchase.

Jeremy and Alicia Youngs' suit names Flair Real Estate, Cell Burke, Lester Saucier Jr. and Angela Gill as defendants and was filed on April 29 in the Orange County District Court.

According to the plaintiffs' petition, on April 4, 2005, the Youngs purchased a home in Vidor. Two years later, the couple entered the attic for the first time and "became aware that the rafters supporting the roof of their home had been fire ravaged."

In their suit, the Youngs say the pieces of wood were so charred that they could be removed by hand. "It became obvious to them that their home had been on fire prior to their purchase, a fact that was never disclosed to them by defendants."

The suit says defendant Saucier was "hand picked" by the real estate agents to perform the pre-sale inspection. "Saucier negligently and fraudulently misrepresented in his inspection report that the roof structure was 'structurally sound.'"

The plaintiffs are accusing all of the defendants of negligent misrepresentation, fraud and conspiracy.

"When defendants made the representations, defendants either knew the representations were false, or made the representations recklessly," the suit says. "Plaintiffs relied on defendants' nondisclosure."

The Youngs are suing for actual, special and exemplary damages, plus attorneys' fees.

They are demanding a trial by jury and are represented by the Law Office of Brian N. Mazzola.

The case has been assigned to the 163rd Judicial District.

Case No. B080170-c



EMAIL A FRIEND | PRINT | DIGG THIS | POST TO DEL.ICIO.US




COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE

No comments have been posted in the last 15 days!


SEND US YOUR COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE



* - Required fields

Subject: *
Message: *
Contact Name: *
Contact URL:
Contact Email: *
Write the text from image below to this textbox


Human image test


SUBSCRIBE To get our free email newsletter and make changes to your subscription:
 
 Subscribe to Print Edition
 Renew Print Edition Subscription
Legally Speaking: The Justies – Part II - 7/1/2008
Legally Speaking: The Justies – Part I - 6/25/2008

ARGUMENTS Archive

Who is negligent when a drunk driver dies in a head on?
The bar
 
 
(8.16%)
The other driver
 
 
(3.06%)
The drunk
 
 
(84.69%)
All of the above
 
 
(4.08%)
 
This poll is closed.

Total Votes: 98

View Results
Need to know more about us or have questions? Try the links below:
By way of introduction
About Us
Contact The Record



Chicago Steaks

Happiness Spreads