www.setexasrecord.com
Jul. 5, 2008 | S.E. Texas' Legal Journal
 
NEWS

Restraining order denied to parents who don't want son to share valedictorian spotlight

5/15/2008 11:45 AM
By David Yates

Angry parents who sued after they found out their son would have to share the valedictorian spotlight were denied their temporary restraining order by Jefferson County Judge Bob Wortham earlier this month.

Paris, Texas, residents Robyn and Robert Zimmerman filed suit on April 28 against Lamar University on behalf of their son Garrett Vick, who is a senior at Texas Academy of Leadership in the Humanities (TALH).

According to the Lamar Web site, Texas Academy is a highly selective, dual enrollment residential high school for gifted and talented students.

On April 10, 2008, Robyn Zimmerman received an e-mail from Mary Gagne, director of the Texas Academy, informing her that there will be four TALH valedictorians this year. Gagne explained that a tie existed and she was appealing to the state to name all four students.

"It is Plaintiffs' understanding that Garrett Vick and three other students have perfect 4.0 averages at Lamar University, but when previous high school careers are taken into consideration, Garrett Vick has the highest GPA," the suit said.

"Plaintiffs have protested to Defendant that an attempt to name more than one recipient was illegal. The Academy's administration in previous years has engaged in conduct that is inconsistent with Texas law by awarding three valedictorians … in the year of 2005/2006."

A hearing for the Zimmermans' restraining order was held on May 1. Shortly after, Judge Wortham denied the parents' request.

Garrett Vick entered the institution during his junior year. Prior to attending Texas Academy, Garrett was a student at Paris High School with a 5.780 GPA, the suit says.

In their suit, the Zimmermans argued they and their son would "suffer immediate and irreparable harm" if Vick was forced to share the award.

The family was represented by attorney Anthony Griffin.

Case No. E181-672


EMAIL A FRIEND | PRINT | DIGG THIS | POST TO DEL.ICIO.US




COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE

No comments have been posted in the last 15 days!


SEND US YOUR COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE



* - Required fields

Subject: *
Message: *
Contact Name: *
Contact URL:
Contact Email: *
Write the text from image below to this textbox


Human image test


SUBSCRIBE To get our free email newsletter and make changes to your subscription:
 
 Subscribe to Print Edition
 Renew Print Edition Subscription
Legally Speaking: The Justies – Part II - 7/1/2008
Legally Speaking: The Justies – Part I - 6/25/2008

ARGUMENTS Archive

Who is negligent when a drunk driver dies in a head on?
The bar
 
 
(8.16%)
The other driver
 
 
(3.06%)
The drunk
 
 
(84.69%)
All of the above
 
 
(4.08%)
 
This poll is closed.

Total Votes: 98

View Results
Need to know more about us or have questions? Try the links below:
By way of introduction
About Us
Contact The Record



Chicago Steaks

Happiness Spreads