www.setexasrecord.com
Jul. 4, 2009 | S.E. Texas' Legal Journal
 
NEWS

GM sued after sports car rollover

6/26/2008 11:31 AM
By Michelle Massey, Texarkana Bureau

MARSHALL -- While driving a 2007 Saturn Sky, Stephen Slider lost control and hit a concrete culvert, causing the vehicle to roll over.

Although Slider maintains he was wearing his seatbelt at the time of the accident, he states he was injured due to the defective nature of the vehicle. Slider states that the luxury sports car was not "reasonably crashworthy, and was not reasonably fit for unintended, but clearly foreseeable, accidents."

Slider and his wife filed a motor vehicle product liability suit against the car's manufacturer, General Motors Corporation, on June20 in the Marshall Division of the Eastern District of Texas.

The complaint alleges the vehicle was defective due to failure to provide adequate occupant protection in a rollover, insufficient structural integrity of roof rail, failure of the vehicle's rollover protection mounts, lack of pop up roll bars or pop up seats, failure to reinforce high back seats to withstand rollover forces, and failure of the defendant to conduct drop tests or rollover testing.

Further, the plaintiff alleges the vehicle was defective by violating the principles of crashworthiness by the destruction of the survival space and failure of survival space rendering other safety systems ineffective.

The suit seeks more than $75,000 in damages for medical expenses, pain and suffering, extreme emotional distress, mental anguish, impairment, disfigurement, lost wages, diminished earning capacity, interference with daily activities, and reduced capacity to enjoy life.

Slider's wife is seeking additional damages for loss of consortium.

Dallas attorneys E. Todd Tracy and Andrew Counts of the Tracy Firm and Tyler attorneys Matthew B. Flanery and Darren Grant of the Grant and Flanery PC are representing the plaintiffs.

Judge T. John Ward will preside over the litigation.

Case No 2:2008cv00248



EMAIL A FRIEND | PRINT | DIGG THIS | POST TO DEL.ICIO.US




COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE

blog comments powered by Disqus
SUBSCRIBE To get our free email newsletter and make changes to your subscription:
 
 Subscribe to Print Edition
 Renew Print Edition Subscription
Shopping for success - 6/27/2009
Legally Speaking: A Poor Excuse for a Column - 6/24/2009

ARGUMENTS Archive

Should Huntsman have settled or continued the trial against the bankers that backed out of the Hexion deal?
Settlement was right
 
(52%)
Continued trial
 
(48%)
Total Votes:21

Thank you for voting in this poll.

This poll is closed.

View Results
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
Need to know more about us or have questions? Try the links below:
By way of introduction
About Us
Contact The Record