www.setexasrecord.com
Jul. 4, 2009 | S.E. Texas' Legal Journal
 
NEWS

$1M salt cake injury suit transferred to OC

7/8/2008 1:52 PM
By David Yates

ORANGE -- Melvin Franklin, who might think twice when hearing the adage "You can't have your cake and eat it too," has had his $1 million suit against Tin Inc. transferred from Jefferson to Orange County.

Franklin sued Tin Inc. after a piece of aluminum salt cake fell and hit him while doing scaffolding work at Tin Temple Inland.

Salt cakes are a waste generated by the aluminum industry during the treatment of aluminum drosses and scrap. The cakes contain aluminum, salt and oxide residue.

In December 2007, The Southeast Texas Record reported on the filing of Franklin's suit. On June 18 the suit was transferred and filed in Orange County District Court.

According to his petition, on Dec. 27, 2005, Franklin, a Turner Scaffolding employee, was hit from behind by a piece of salt cake, which fell from the top of Tin's property.

"During the time that Plaintiff was upon Defendant's property, Plaintiff was seriously injured as a result of the incident," the suit said. "The Defendant's employees knew or should have known that the area where Plaintiff was working was hazardous."

Franklin suffered injuries to his, neck, back, shoulder and head, the suit said.

"Defendant's employees negligently or willfully failed to provide a safe place for Plaintiff to work in that Defendant failed to make sure that all of the salt cake was washed out of the tubes and in that Defendant failed to secure the tubes which would have prevented the salt cake from falling on top of Plaintiff s body," the suit said.

Franklin is also suing for past and future mental anguish, pain, impairment, lost earnings, disfigurement and medical costs, plus all court costs.

He is demanding a trial by jury and is represented by attorney Don Caggins Sr.

Judge Buddy Hahn, 260th Judicial District, has been assigned to the case.

D-080234



EMAIL A FRIEND | PRINT | DIGG THIS | POST TO DEL.ICIO.US




COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE

blog comments powered by Disqus
SUBSCRIBE To get our free email newsletter and make changes to your subscription:
 
 Subscribe to Print Edition
 Renew Print Edition Subscription
Shopping for success - 6/27/2009
Legally Speaking: A Poor Excuse for a Column - 6/24/2009

ARGUMENTS Archive

Should Huntsman have settled or continued the trial against the bankers that backed out of the Hexion deal?
Settlement was right
 
(52%)
Continued trial
 
(48%)
Total Votes:21

Thank you for voting in this poll.

This poll is closed.

View Results
Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
Need to know more about us or have questions? Try the links below:
By way of introduction
About Us
Contact The Record